Skip to main content

Dutch media professionals for Bhutan's election coverage

April 23, 2013 marks the general election in the Kingdom of Bhutan. 20 Councillors, one each from twenty districts will be elected on this day.


The king, whether the fourth king Jigme Singye or his son the present king Jigme Khesar owe still the great deal of power to elcet 5 Councillors on the behalf of the monarchy. It is not known outside who will be elected and how by these two kings.

The ruling party of Jigme Yoeser Thinlay Druk Puensum Tshogpa is comfortably lobbying for its second winning, where has its oppositon Bhutan Democratic Party is creaping up to contest equally. Its leader, the king's in-law, Sangay Ngedup shy away when he lost the expected seats in the 2008 election. Only three seats it woned was later grew to controversy.

Meanwhile 5 parties will be contesting the upcoming election. The three new parties are Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa (DNT), Bhutan Kuen-Ngyam Party (BKNP) and Druk Chirwang Tshogpa (DCT). Two of the three are headed by female, an encouraging change in woman's political emancipation.

All these parties claim that their political ideology is social democracy and Gross National Happiness.  The policy manifestos include balanced regional economic development, equitable social development, good governance, capitalism, voice of voiceless, devolution of power, nurturing Indo-Bhutan friendship, fight against crony capitalism and inclusive economic growth.  It seems the parties are stating whatever words that would appease the current political culture.Surprising they hardly speak of the human rights and freedoms, the right of the minorities and the refugee issues.
  
A country with less than 700,000 populations has almost 20% of the total population living outside in exile.   In exile too there are three political parties, namely BPP, BNDP and DNC, which have campaigned for the change in Bhutan since the early 1990s.  More than 30,000 Bhutanese refugees are still in the UNHCR organized camps in East Nepal awaiting repatriation. Bhutanese so called democratic government has always denied their repatriation.

The emerging political scenario in Bhutan appears at best, still under controll by the state interest. The state interest is to have upper hand of the oligarchy and uphold the values of Drukpa culture alone however the there are many ethnic groups with different culture and aspirations.

Meanwhile  the Dutch media professionals are ahead in preparing the Bhutanese journalists on how to report the forthcoming election. They began training in December 2012 at The Radio Netherlands World Service where a training center is also envisaged.

A local portal in Hilversum  highlighted the news that the Dutch are busy with the Bhutanese media counterparts to train them how to report the election news. Bhutanese journalists do know however how to report and how avoid reporting the news events following their own national culture. Although they may learn a lot about the use of the new technology, its use practically would de restricted by the norms of editing and reporting set by the media corporations like Bhutan Broadcasting Service and Kuensel. This can be attributed by the fact that about 80 000 Bhutanese mainly the ethnic Lhotshampas were denied the right to adult franchise in the first election of 2008 and that was not reported yet by the Bhutanese media. This trend of exclusive assertion is likely to follow in the forthcoming election because non of the parties are raising this issue of subdued adult franchise in Bhutan.

This year many Dutch journalists are likely to visit Bhutan during the election, but yet hopes are very dismal to hear the balanced news coming out of the country. If they do report all the sides of the election, particularly the discrimination factors against the Lhotshampas, then it could be their last visit for reporting in Bhutan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Golden yoke and silken knot against Bhutan's democracy

13 July 2013 General election day. The early 16 th century’s two fold law codes of Shabdung; spiritual and temporal, that the former as a silken knot gradually becoming tighter and tighter, and the later as a golden yoke that is growing heavier and heavier, is bearing its obvious results in Bhutan’s constitutional democracy today, being it incorporated in the constitution. Despite the first five year democratic government machinery under the leadership of one of the most experienced aristocrat, the Prime Minister Jigme Yoeser Thinley, (April 2008 to May 2013) the true aspirations of the people fell unrecognised and continuously oppressed. Whether Naglong, Sarchop, Kheng or Lhotshamp; being a Bhutanese by birth and legal assimilation have the sanctimonious dignity based on the identity of the state and their own nomenclature as ‘Bhutanese’.  To keep this dignity upheld by the state is their true aspiration whatever the form of the government may be. For this, they all aspire to

Buddhist leader of Tibet, Dalai Lama coming closer to Krishna consciousness

23-3-17.   It is a great step forward to animal welfare and world peace at large that h ighly esteemed Buddhist head of abbot, the Dalai Lama of Tibet is coming closer to  Krishna consciousness . Dalai Lama with Indradymna Maharaj in Vrindavan His Holiness Dalai Lama presiding over the Tibetan government in exile in India visiting Vrindavan yesterday may not be a new anecdote but his hankering for the association of the pure devotees of the Supreme Personality of Godhead Krishna and offer obeisance is remarkably a spiritual advancement that would go further from the Buddhist understanding of salvation as ‘ending up in zero or emptiness,  sunyata’  to the attainment of servitorship of the Lord Krishna personally, which is indeed more valuably pursued than the pursuit of the liberation,  mukti . According to the Vedic view point Buddhism is not a religion, in the sense that the Vedas guides its staunch followers attain its Supreme profounder, the God Krishna. But the Bud

Angkor: The India’s great influence of the past in Cambodia

This is research report,  used to produce a documentary film by OHM en Rob Hof. The documentary was broadcasted on 12/12/2007 on Nederland1 TV Channel. Scroll down to see in English>> Dit is een van mijn literatuuronderzoek rapport voor  een documentairfilm.  Aan de hand van dit rapport over invloed van India in ASEAN heeft OHM en RobHof Film een documentair gemaakt. Het was uitdezonden op Nederlands 2 op 12 december 2007 zie die film:  India buiten India Angkor:    India buiten India Samenvatting van de repport. De tempels van Angkor zijn in circa negen honderd jaar geleden opgebouwd  door verscheidene Khmervorsten. Daardoor verschillen ze duidelijk in bouwstijl en zijn er zowel hindoeïstische als boeddhistische tempels te zien. Het was al jaren in de bos geheim gebleven.  In de loop van de jaren zijn er veel boeken verschenen over de tempel Angkor. Zo zijn er schrijvers geweest die beweren dat het een Boeddhistische tempel is. Anderen daarentegen